FCC 24.16 Revised as of October 1, 2006
Goto Year:2005 |
2007
Sec. 24.16 Criteria for comparative renewal proceedings.
A renewal applicant involved in a comparative renewal proceeding shall
receive a preference, commonly referred to as a renewal expectancy, which is
the most important comparative factor to be considered in the proceeding, if
its past record for the relevant license period demonstrates that the
renewal applicant:
(a) Has provided “substantial” service during its past license term.
“Substantial” service is defined as service which is sound, favorable, and
substantially above a level of mediocre service which might just minimally
warrant renewal; and
(b) Has substantially complied with applicable Commission rules, policies
and the Communications Act.
Subpart C—Technical Standards
CiteFind - See documents on FCC website that
cite this rule
Want to support this service?
Thanks!
Report errors in
this rule. Since these rules are converted to HTML by machine, it's possible errors have been made. Please
help us improve these rules by clicking the Report FCC Rule Errors link to report an error.